While all of this
This could force t
It isn’t immediate
smoremail.com
numchk.com
Blindside Time
Bring the Popcorn
Rice Wars
I realised the rea
Desperate Measures

We were shocked an
What it was like f
Fractured fairy ta
Horoscope and Astr
Mad Treasure Hunt
Flirting and Frust
This Is Extortion
IoT Mesh Yagi kBan
Rice Wars
Fight for Your Lif
Another argument against these transfers comes from the fact that the Romans themselves could not bear to see them; for, in answer to a question put to them by the consuls, regarding the policy of transferring the conquered to other lands, they answered that they should not take that course, if any other way offered of gaining an honourable end by that mode of terminating a war. Caius Lutatius Catulus said to Cneius Piso, "Have you not yet learnt that in other states, and among the Hellenes too, the name of Roman is a term of disgrace?" Upon the same occasion, in reply to the proposal to take the Carthaginians into their own service and enfranchise them, Servilius Geminus, when asked what he had to say, made answer thus: "I have heard some individuals speak in favour of it; but even if it should prove in the end a profitable speculation, I am not willing to believe that the gods ought to be taken into service and enfranchised as a mere business speculation." But the greatest proof of the unpopularity of this proposal is found in the case of the Achaeans, who, according to the will of the Achaean League, were transferred to the Roman province, by a decree of the Achaean Council. A very strong case this, when one sees that the Achaean people themselves did not approve of their transfer; for in other cases their resolutions were disregarded by the Roman magistrates, when they thought them unprofitable. But this resolution was regarded by them as so much more opposed to the interests of Rome, that they thought it their duty, even at the cost of life and property, to endeavour to frustrate it. But if the Romans thought that those citizens had a right to be transferred who were of the same stock, why, pray, did they not apply the same principle to themselves? Did they, when the Carthaginians were transferred to themselves, take the Carthaginians into their own service, or only those of the same stock as themselves? It was to the interest of the Carthaginians to preserve the friendship of the Romans, and that of the Romans to be on terms of good understanding with the Carthaginians; for that was the only road to securing peace. Therefore the Romans had good grounds for transferring the Carthaginians to themselves. The Carthaginians also could not preserve their own peace without the assistance of the Romans; consequently that was a matter of greater importance than would be the peace of Rome without the friendship of the Carthaginians. There was a difference too in the case of the Carthaginians; for they were in a position to gain from the friendship of the Romans, whilst the Romans had to gain from the friendship of the Carthaginians. That was the reason why the Carthaginians and the Romans entered into alliance against Philip, who had invaded Sicily, as also against the Sardinians, the former being an ally of the Romans and the latter of Philip. And it was on these grounds that the Roman general, when he took up his command against the Sardinians, told them that they must not only continue to be allies to him and the Romans, but they must also go so far as to give up the Carthaginians as well as Philip to him. [B.C. 201 (_a. u_. 711)] [-35-] When the Romans had made their decision regarding the exchange of prisoners, they appointed their commanders and tribunes, as usual, and assigned quarters for each of them. A short time elapsed before Geminius was sent out against the Gauls, whom, as he was now on good terms with the state, he did not hesitate to attack. The other emperor, who had recently been designated, was named Veturius. The envoys from the Sicilians arrived at Rome; but, as they could not prevail on the praetors to hear them, because the praetors were in their camp with the army, they were dismissed without any answer, save that they should be re-elected a second time. However, even before the election a proclamation of recall had been sent out to the colonies on the Capitol, and that was done with such promptness that many who were even in their own houses when they received the message came forth immediately on hearing it. When Veturius, too, learnt that an order had been issued for the appointment of another emperor, he sent to say that he would resign the appointment if he were not confirmed by the Senate. But when the latter sent him a written answer as a man who had been sent to them to govern the state, he withdrew his resignation and departed. [-36-] After this appointment Geminius returned to the army at the call of the praetor Gnaeus Cornelius Lentulus, and took the field against the Gauls. He subdued them partly by force and partly by negotiation, and they became in consequence subject to the Roman people. There was great rejoicing throughout the city, on account of which they thought that the war against the Gauls was finished; but just then, being disappointed of their hopes in regard to the Macedonians, they had hopes that, after Geminius' return, war would be resumed against the Gauls. Accordingly Gnaeus Manlius Vulso, who was sent out with the praetor Marcus Postumius by the senate in accordance with the decree of the people, declared that he had come out with the sole object of taking the war with the Gauls into his own hands. The Gauls had also sent ambassadors to Rome, but to no effect. [-37-] When these were out of the way, the envoys from the Sicilians arrived; for some had come to Rome, and others from them. There were in all nearly eight hundred; but they had been detained, so to speak, at Larissa, as they could not be admitted to Rome by reason of the consul. At length, when the praetor took possession of his post, having arranged things as follows, the Sicilians made their appearance. The praetor had received and taken on oath a large number of representatives from among the Sicilians. The envoys came at first with only a few friends; but, as the Romans appeared eager to listen to them, the remainder followed as they were admitted. Their spokesman was Gelo. After a short time the consul appeared, as if he would address the praetor, but not venturing to do so openly, he stepped into a neighbouring house. Now Gelo was well aware that he was being insulted, and he made an open attempt to compel his dismissal. But since in this act he displayed much more passion than dignity, a crowd had gathered round the consul, who, when Gelo raised a hue and cry, turned his back on him and departed. The envoys then complained at length to the consul of their being treated so disgracefully, and stated what had happened and begged that he should intervene. The consul acknowledged that his colleague had shown disrespect to them and to the Romans, and asked to be excused on account of illness. The envoys, when they had learned this answer, went to see the consul, and explained their cause of grief at greater length than before, and declared that there was no state in the world where they would be so insulted as in that of Rome; but the consul was in no frame of mind to listen to them. He therefore ordered them to depart; and, when they refused to do so, dismissed them without their obtaining anything. [-38-] At this Gelo, being angry, said that not only were they dismissed but they were also forbidden ever to see him again. He therefore, in order that the senate might hear of it, summoned one of the praetors to meet him, and bade him write a letter to Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, dictator, in which he declared that he did not regard it as anything short of an insult for a commander of a Roman legion to be denied admission into the city by its magistrates, if, even at Rome, and in their own house, he had been treated with such discourtesy; and if the consul, though sick, had gone forth to meet them, he had been insulted, since no one was allowed to come near them except the praetor, and he ought to have made the consul come out himself with his hands raised, had the latter so wished. They were therefore to summon their ambassadors and convey them to the dictator. The latter expressed indignation over the insult, and promised that he would call a meeting of the senate and order the consul to receive his colleagues. Accordingly, when they came into the senate he addressed the consul in a moderate tone, and ordered him